- 17 Apr, 2005 1 commit
-
-
Ryan C. Gordon authored
Kero, here: http://www.devolution.com/pipermail/sdl/2005-March/067630.html --HG-- extra : convert_revision : svn%3Ac70aab31-4412-0410-b14c-859654838e24/trunk%401047
-
- 18 Jul, 2004 1 commit
-
-
Sam Lantinga authored
From: David Symmonds Subject: SDL Typedef Structs Hi, Thanks for the SDL libraries, I have been using them for about a year now and they are really brilliant. One thing that I have just found whilst using them through C++ (and needing forward declarations) is that when you typedef structs you sometimes use typedef struct Name { ... }Name; e.g. SDL_Surface and other times use typedef struct { ... }Name; e.g. SDL_Rect The first type works fine, when I define a header file I can just put 'struct Name;' at the top and use the Name throughout. However, the second type is harder to use in a header, and I haven't found a way yet, other than to include 'SDL.h' in the header file (undesirable). Would there be any harm in changing the definition of SDL_Rect and such like to the second form? --HG-- extra : convert_revision : svn%3Ac70aab31-4412-0410-b14c-859654838e24/trunk%40912
-
- 04 Jan, 2004 1 commit
-
-
Sam Lantinga authored
--HG-- extra : convert_revision : svn%3Ac70aab31-4412-0410-b14c-859654838e24/trunk%40770
-
- 11 Apr, 2002 1 commit
-
-
Sam Lantinga authored
--HG-- extra : convert_revision : svn%3Ac70aab31-4412-0410-b14c-859654838e24/trunk%40338
-
- 06 Mar, 2002 1 commit
-
-
Sam Lantinga authored
--HG-- extra : convert_revision : svn%3Ac70aab31-4412-0410-b14c-859654838e24/trunk%40298
-
- 14 Dec, 2001 1 commit
-
-
Sam Lantinga authored
--HG-- extra : convert_revision : svn%3Ac70aab31-4412-0410-b14c-859654838e24/trunk%40252
-
- 26 Apr, 2001 1 commit
-
-
Sam Lantinga authored
--HG-- extra : convert_revision : svn%3Ac70aab31-4412-0410-b14c-859654838e24/trunk%401
-